The argument from disagreement for moral relativism is an interesting but complex concept that holds that since people disagree about what is morally right and wrong, there cannot be any objective moral standards that apply universally. This argument is often used to support the view that morality is relative to individual cultures, societies, or even individuals.
The idea behind the argument from disagreement is that if there were objective moral standards, then everyone would agree on what was morally right and wrong. But since people have different moral beliefs, it follows that there cannot be any objective moral standards that apply universally. This argument is often used to counter claims that some actions are objectively wrong, such as murder or theft, by pointing out that there are cultures or societies in which such actions are not considered wrong.
One of the main strengths of the argument from disagreement is that it recognizes the fact that there is a great deal of moral diversity in the world. Different cultures and societies have developed different moral codes and norms, and individuals within those cultures and societies also have different moral beliefs. This diversity can be seen as evidence that there are no universal moral standards that apply to all people in all places and times.
However, some critics of the argument from disagreement argue that the fact that people disagree about moral issues does not necessarily imply that there are no objective moral standards. They point out that disagreement about a topic does not necessarily mean that there is no objective truth about that topic. For example, many people disagree about the nature of God, but that does not mean that there is no objective truth about God`s existence or nature.
Furthermore, the argument from disagreement can be seen as a form of the is-ought fallacy, which is the idea that just because something is a certain way (in this case, that people disagree about moral issues), that it ought to be that way (in this case, that there are no objective moral standards). The fact that people disagree about moral issues does not necessarily mean that there cannot be objective moral standards that apply universally.
In conclusion, the argument from disagreement for moral relativism is an interesting concept that recognizes the great diversity of moral beliefs and practices in the world. However, it is important to be cautious about drawing conclusions from this diversity, and recognize that disagreement about a topic does not necessarily imply that there is no objective truth about that topic. As a professional, it is important to present both sides of the argument and allow readers to draw their own conclusions based on the evidence presented.